It has become obvious that the lack of interest to change course in most western countries obnoxious and ineffective covid-19 policies despites it’s glaring failure gives credence to the speculation that this has been deliberately engineered to achieve some objectives.
Think about this, the world population is exploding exponentially. In the past, world wars have helped to keep this in check which have not occurred for almost a century.
With improved health care and better standard of living our life spans have extended with the consequence of population increase.
If not checked this can lead to global unrest with increasing unemployment and global warming due to man activities that leads to environmental pollution and degradation.
A drastic populationreset may potentially solve the problem of climate change and avert the impending global unrest due to unemployment and hunger.
But is the chosen means of population reduction morally and ethically right? I think this is tantamount to sardism to inflict long term chronic illness, pain, suffering and premature death on global population.
It appears the knowlege gained in the human genome project is now being utlized as a weapon for extermination rather than advancement of humanity.
The world needs to find a better and acceptable population control mechanism that respects the dignity and sanctity of life rather than committing outright genocide.
China's pioneer model of restricting the maximum number of children per family may be worth considering by countries with unsustainable population growth.
Oh no. So much wrong with this. 1. Man does not contribute one iota to climate change / global warming (except for chemtrails and Gates' other machinations to try and block out the sun). 2. The world can easily sustain the current population and even more in terms of food and "employment". The solution is not depopulation but rather re-education of the population as to what is productive and what consumption is destructive. The notion of "employment" is linked to money and money is linked to power. If we refocus on abundance of resource instead of excess of wealth, it is much easier and more natural to share what you don't need "and be happy". The concentration of excess in the elites is the problem, not least because they are nowhere near the most productive. If you think depopulation is the solution to global unrest and hunger, then the world only needs to rid itself of a few hundred people to be reset. You know who I mean?
The French Revolution sought de-population. In the following section, beginning on page 423, Webster described a widely discussed and widely accepted program of the Jacobin revolutionaries associated with Robespierre. It was a program of systematic de-population by the government: literal extermination. The Jacobins planned to murder as much as half of the French population. This fact is never discussed in graduate school seminars. Here is her discussion. I omit her footnotes.
But could a nation of 25,000,000 be thus transformed? To the regenerators of France it seemed extremely doubtful; already the country was rent with dissensions, and any scheme for universal contentment seemed impossible of attainment. Moreover, the plan of dividing things up into equal shares presented an insuperable difficulty, for it became evident that amongst a population of this size there was not enough money, not enough property, not enough employment, not even at this moment enough bread to go round; no one would be satisfied with his share, and instead of universal contentment, universal dissatisfaction would result. What was to be done? The population was too large for the scheme of the leaders to be carried out successfully, therefore either the scheme must be abandoned or the population must he diminished.
To this conclusion the surgeons operating on the State had at last been brought. In vain they had amputated the gangrened limb of the nobility and the clergy, had paralysed the brain by attacking the intellectual classes, had turned (as in Aesop's fable) upon the stomach, that is to say, the industrial system, by which the whole body of the State was fed, and denied it sustenance--all these means to restore health to the State had failed, and they were now reduced to a last and desperate expedient: the size of the whole body must be reduced. In other words, a plan of systematic depopulation must be carried out all over France.
That this idea, worthy of a mad Procrustes, really existed it is impossible to doubt, since it has been revealed to us by innumerable revolutionaries who were behind the scenes during the Terror. Thus Courtois, in his report on the papers seized at Robespierre's house after Thermidor, wrote: "These men, in order to bring us to the happiness of Sparta, wished to annihilate twelve or fifteen millions of the French people, and hoped after this revolutionary transfiguration to distribute to each one a plough and some land to clear, so as to save us from the dangers of the happiness of Persepolis."
Another intime of Robespierre, the Marquis d'Antonelle, a member of the Revolutionary Tribunal, actually explained the whole scheme in print whilst the Terror was at its height. Beaulieu, who met him in prison, where he was incarcerated by Robespierre for giving away the secret of the leaders, thus describes the system as revealed to him by D'Antonelle: "He thought, like the greater number of the revolutionary clubs, that, in order to institute the Republic on the ruins of the monarchy, it was necessary to exterminate all those who preferred the latter form of government, and that the former could only become democratic by the destruction of luxury and riches, which form the support of royalty; that equality would never be anything but a chimera as long as men did not all enjoy approximately equal properties; and finally, that such an order of things could never be established until a third of the population had been suppressed; this was the general idea of the fanatics of the Revolution."
"China's model of restricting the maximum number of children per family may be worth considering". China has ended the one child per family rule. China adopted that rule after Kissinger's visits in the early seventies during normalizations with the US. US foreign policy is based upon "depopulation" of other countries.
Oh no. So much wrong with this. 1. Man does not contribute one iota to climate change / global warming (except for chemtrails and Gates' other machinations to try and block out the sun). 2. The world can easily sustain the current population and even more in terms of food and "employment". The solution is not depopulation but rather re-education of the population as to what is productive and what consumption is destructive. The notion of "employment" is linked to money and money is linked to power. If we refocus on abundance of resource instead of excess of wealth, it is much easier and more natural to share what you don't need "and be happy". The concentration of excess in the elites is the problem, not least because they are nowhere near the most productive. If you think depopulation is the solution to global unrest and hunger, then the world only needs to rid itself of a few hundred people to be reset. You know who I mean?
The French Revolution sought de-population. In the following section, beginning on page 423, Webster described a widely discussed and widely accepted program of the Jacobin revolutionaries associated with Robespierre. It was a program of systematic de-population by the government: literal extermination. The Jacobins planned to murder as much as half of the French population. This fact is never discussed in graduate school seminars. Here is her discussion. I omit her footnotes.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
But could a nation of 25,000,000 be thus transformed? To the regenerators of France it seemed extremely doubtful; already the country was rent with dissensions, and any scheme for universal contentment seemed impossible of attainment. Moreover, the plan of dividing things up into equal shares presented an insuperable difficulty, for it became evident that amongst a population of this size there was not enough money, not enough property, not enough employment, not even at this moment enough bread to go round; no one would be satisfied with his share, and instead of universal contentment, universal dissatisfaction would result. What was to be done? The population was too large for the scheme of the leaders to be carried out successfully, therefore either the scheme must be abandoned or the population must he diminished.
To this conclusion the surgeons operating on the State had at last been brought. In vain they had amputated the gangrened limb of the nobility and the clergy, had paralysed the brain by attacking the intellectual classes, had turned (as in Aesop's fable) upon the stomach, that is to say, the industrial system, by which the whole body of the State was fed, and denied it sustenance--all these means to restore health to the State had failed, and they were now reduced to a last and desperate expedient: the size of the whole body must be reduced. In other words, a plan of systematic depopulation must be carried out all over France.
That this idea, worthy of a mad Procrustes, really existed it is impossible to doubt, since it has been revealed to us by innumerable revolutionaries who were behind the scenes during the Terror. Thus Courtois, in his report on the papers seized at Robespierre's house after Thermidor, wrote: "These men, in order to bring us to the happiness of Sparta, wished to annihilate twelve or fifteen millions of the French people, and hoped after this revolutionary transfiguration to distribute to each one a plough and some land to clear, so as to save us from the dangers of the happiness of Persepolis."
Another intime of Robespierre, the Marquis d'Antonelle, a member of the Revolutionary Tribunal, actually explained the whole scheme in print whilst the Terror was at its height. Beaulieu, who met him in prison, where he was incarcerated by Robespierre for giving away the secret of the leaders, thus describes the system as revealed to him by D'Antonelle: "He thought, like the greater number of the revolutionary clubs, that, in order to institute the Republic on the ruins of the monarchy, it was necessary to exterminate all those who preferred the latter form of government, and that the former could only become democratic by the destruction of luxury and riches, which form the support of royalty; that equality would never be anything but a chimera as long as men did not all enjoy approximately equal properties; and finally, that such an order of things could never be established until a third of the population had been suppressed; this was the general idea of the fanatics of the Revolution."
"China's model of restricting the maximum number of children per family may be worth considering". China has ended the one child per family rule. China adopted that rule after Kissinger's visits in the early seventies during normalizations with the US. US foreign policy is based upon "depopulation" of other countries.
There is NO population explosion. most western populations are in DECLINE. China is expected to take a massive hit by mid century